<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compiling Inkscape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 04:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnepOpedgeken</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>EnepOpedgeken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>почему бы и нет :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>почему бы и нет :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silveira</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-3623</link>
		<dc:creator>Silveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-3623</guid>
		<description>@Tony, yes there are people working in the JavaFX 1.1 exporter module. Check out in the Inkscape dev list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony, yes there are people working in the JavaFX 1.1 exporter module. Check out in the Inkscape dev list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>Hi Silveira,

Thanks for the post ... I found on Ibis (8.10) that I had to include libgsl0-dev in the list of dependencies.
I&#039;m also trying to use this with JavaFX 1.1 and it seems they&#039;ve changed some of the syntax to the point where the exported .fx is full of errors when I import into netbeans ... eg: package javafx.application does not exist, package javafx.scene.geometry does not exist, the private keyword is no longer supported ... etc.
Do you know if anyone&#039;s working on a 1.1 compliant version.
I&#039;d be happy to help.

Cheers,
tc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Silveira,</p>
<p>Thanks for the post &#8230; I found on Ibis (8.10) that I had to include libgsl0-dev in the list of dependencies.<br />
I&#8217;m also trying to use this with JavaFX 1.1 and it seems they&#8217;ve changed some of the syntax to the point where the exported .fx is full of errors when I import into netbeans &#8230; eg: package javafx.application does not exist, package javafx.scene.geometry does not exist, the private keyword is no longer supported &#8230; etc.<br />
Do you know if anyone&#8217;s working on a 1.1 compliant version.<br />
I&#8217;d be happy to help.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
tc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>Very nice tutorial. Worked well with a fresh install of 8.10 (Ibis) Ubuntu and the second suggestion you give in this tut article about the dependancies. (with a lot of warnings and a suggestion to --force-configure), but it did finally comes up with a 64-bit AMD version. Inkscape draws shapes and SaveAs with JavaFX. Menu Help --&gt; About Inkscape and it has .46+devel. Beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice tutorial. Worked well with a fresh install of 8.10 (Ibis) Ubuntu and the second suggestion you give in this tut article about the dependancies. (with a lot of warnings and a suggestion to &#8211;force-configure), but it did finally comes up with a 64-bit AMD version. Inkscape draws shapes and SaveAs with JavaFX. Menu Help &#8211;&gt; About Inkscape and it has .46+devel. Beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silveira Neto &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inkscape and JavaFX working together</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Silveira Neto &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inkscape and JavaFX working together</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>[...] using Inkscape 0.46-devel, build from the unstable sources and NetBeans 6.1 with the JavaFX module. See here how to build Inkscape from sources and here how to do some optimizations on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] using Inkscape 0.46-devel, build from the unstable sources and NetBeans 6.1 with the JavaFX module. See here how to build Inkscape from sources and here how to do some optimizations on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silveira</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-2772</link>
		<dc:creator>Silveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-2772</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;./configure --prefix=/opt/inkscape&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Is how I actually use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>./configure &#8211;prefix=/opt/inkscape</p></blockquote>
<p>Is how I actually use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobus</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice post Silveira!

Patola, a simple rule on critisism - if you give it, make it constructive. If there are good ways of improving on Silveira&#039;s recommended procedure, then please share it with the same care he used in the first place. I would loooove to know of the best way to go about it, and I&#039;m sure Silveira, would be open for suggestions. Let&#039;s not do the Microsoft thing and treat other people like nobodies. Ubuntu means Together! Let&#039;s work Together. Let&#039;s work Ubuntu!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice post Silveira!</p>
<p>Patola, a simple rule on critisism &#8211; if you give it, make it constructive. If there are good ways of improving on Silveira&#8217;s recommended procedure, then please share it with the same care he used in the first place. I would loooove to know of the best way to go about it, and I&#8217;m sure Silveira, would be open for suggestions. Let&#8217;s not do the Microsoft thing and treat other people like nobodies. Ubuntu means Together! Let&#8217;s work Together. Let&#8217;s work Ubuntu!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ishnal</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>ishnal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-2012</guid>
		<description>Patola,

./configure; make is a perfectly viable way for partisans in a project to get the latest version.  Occasionally one needs to go to the source to get the &quot;real thing.&quot;  Often, distros and packagers inject bugs into otherwise stable builds.  In Inkscape&#039;s case, there is no devel/user schism....  everyone is a developer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patola,</p>
<p>./configure; make is a perfectly viable way for partisans in a project to get the latest version.  Occasionally one needs to go to the source to get the &#8220;real thing.&#8221;  Often, distros and packagers inject bugs into otherwise stable builds.  In Inkscape&#8217;s case, there is no devel/user schism&#8230;.  everyone is a developer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patola</title>
		<link>http://silveiraneto.net/2008/08/04/compiling-inkscape/comment-page-1/#comment-1998</link>
		<dc:creator>Patola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silveiraneto.net/?p=1046#comment-1998</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t EVER tell people using such a beautifully engineered OS as Ubuntu to screw up their software installation databases using &quot;configure-make-make install&quot; procedures. apt and dpkg exist for a very good reason and are carefully designed just to avoid polluting the system.

There is apt-build, dpkg-buildpackage and several good recipes on the internet that tell how to use a newer tarball or svn tree to build a new .deb. It is very close to your explanation, but does not spread hundreds of files outside the reach of your dpkg database.

So close, and you missed just the important part. I could swallow it if you recommended sometuing as checkinstall, but this is preposterous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t EVER tell people using such a beautifully engineered OS as Ubuntu to screw up their software installation databases using &#8220;configure-make-make install&#8221; procedures. apt and dpkg exist for a very good reason and are carefully designed just to avoid polluting the system.</p>
<p>There is apt-build, dpkg-buildpackage and several good recipes on the internet that tell how to use a newer tarball or svn tree to build a new .deb. It is very close to your explanation, but does not spread hundreds of files outside the reach of your dpkg database.</p>
<p>So close, and you missed just the important part. I could swallow it if you recommended sometuing as checkinstall, but this is preposterous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

